Cases 1 - 10 of 627
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Styles et al v. The Bank of Missouri et al
as 3:2024cv03137
Plaintiff:
Auria Styles, Tynia Baisden, Chilette Brown and others
Defendant:
The Bank of Missouri, First Electronic Bank, Concora Credit Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hart v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 2:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Carol Hart
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Carol Givens v. John Vavra, et al
as 24-3381
Plaintiff:
CAROL L. GIVENS
Defendant:
JUDGE JOHN A. VAVRA, MAYOR ROBERT NEWHART, SR., BELMONT COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Stanfill-EL v. Bay et al
as 3:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Stanfill-EL
Defendant:
Melissa Bay, Department of PVARO Vocation Rehabilitation, Gary Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Judicial Watch, Inc. et al v. The Illinois State Board of Elections et al
as 1:2024cv01867
Plaintiff:
Judicial Watch, Inc., Illinois Family Action, Breakthrough Ideas and others
Defendant:
The Illinois State Board of Elections and Bernadette Matthews
Intervenor:
Illinois AFL-CIO and Illinois Federation of Teachers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00692
Defendant:
David R. Jones, Elizabeth Carol Freeman, Jackson Walker, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Bouchard v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Morton S Bouchard
Defendant:
David R Jones, Elizabeth Carol Freeman, Jackson Walker, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
