Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Doe v. Hilton Resorts Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv03499
Plaintiff:
Jane (K.R.D) Doe
Defendant:
Hilton Resorts Corporation, Hilton Management LLC, Hilton Franchise Holding LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. ESA P Portfolio LLC
as 3:2023cv06038
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe S A S, Jane Doe and S.A.S.
Defendant:
ESA P Portfolio LLC, Red Lion Hotels Corporation, Crossland Tacoma and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595 Civil Remedies: Sex trafficking of children or TVPRA
Doe v. Brisam Clinton LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04032
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Brisam Clinton LLC d/b/a Comfort Inn, MK LCP Rye LLC D/B/A Hilton, BRE/PRIME MEZZ LLC D/B/A LA QUINTA INN & SUITES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
SHANNON et al v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SHANNON and KELLY A. SHANNON
Defendant:
TRANS UNION L.L.C, Experian Information Solutions Inc, Equifax Information Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SHANNON et al v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv03875
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SHANNON and KELLY A. SHANNON
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hilton Resorts Corporation et al v. Sussman
as 6:2019cv00305
Plaintiff:
KT Vacation Owners Association, Inc., LV Tower 52 Condominium Association, Inc., HTLV Owners Association, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mitchell Reed Sussman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Association for Disabled Americans, Inc., et al v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc., et al
as 1:2011cv24353
Plaintiff:
The Association for Disabled Americans, Inc., and Daniel Ruiz
Defendant:
Hilton Worldwide, Inc., Kelco FB Ocean Point LLC., Ocean Point Beach Club Condominium Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
