Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Doe v. The Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans
as 2:2020cv01362
Defendant:
The Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Squeeze Me Once, LLC v. SunTrust Bank et al
as 3:2019cv00787
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and SunTrust Bank
Plaintiff:
Squeeze Me Once, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Strange v. Healthy Halo Insurance Services Inc et al
as 5:2019cv01388
Defendant:
Brent Thomas Heurter, Healthy Halo Insurance Services Inc, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Strange v. Doe #1 et al
as 5:2019cv01096
Defendant:
John Doe #2, John Doe #1 and Prospect America Inc
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Strange v. Doe
as 5:2018cv01028
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Asset Management Services Group L L C et al
as 5:2016cv01291
Plaintiff:
Denise Wade
Defendant:
Asset Management Services Group L L C, Silverpoint Ltd, Mentoli Trade Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wade v. Asset Management Services Group, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01291
Plaintiff:
Denise Wade
Defendant:
Asset Management Services Group L L C, Silverpoint Ltd, Mentoli Trade Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wade v. Miller Stark Klein & Associates et al
as 5:2016cv01290
Plaintiff:
Denise Wade
Defendant:
Miller Stark Klein & Associates , Darryl Miller , Ronald Hough and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Seamon v. Facebook, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00689
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Janet Seamon , LA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Caldwell v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00542
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Laboratories, Inc. and John Doe(s) 1-100
Plaintiff:
James D Buddy Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
