Cases 1 - 10 of 15
KELLY v. DORMAN et al
as 4:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
MARK KELLY
Defendant:
DANIEL DORMAN, DAVID WRIGHT, CHRISTOPHER HANSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DOE et al v. USA GYMNASTICS, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01716
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYMNASTICS FOUNDATION, USA GYMNASTICS, INC., SHARP'S GYMNASTICS ACADEMY and others
Plaintiff:
KELLY CUTRIGHT, M DOE and M. DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SUMMERS v. FIRST NATIONAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00407
Defendant:
FIRST NATIONAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. and LVNV FUNDING, LLC
Plaintiff:
KELLY SUMMERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kelly et al v. Midland Credit Management Inc
as 4:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kelly and Lela Kelly
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KELLY v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
as 1:2014cv01499
Plaintiff:
SHARLOT KELLY
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
GILES v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE LLC
as 1:2014cv00598
Defendant:
ASSET ACCEPTANCE LLC
Plaintiff:
KELLI GILES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. Kozub et al
as 2:2012cv00437
Plaintiff:
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Defendant:
Katrina M Kozub , Kelly A Domijancic , Jessica A Domijancic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
TUTIN v. THOMAS BROWN & ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01157
Defendant:
NATIONAL CHECK ARBITRATION SERVICES, INC. and THOMAS BROWN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH KELLY TUTIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GILLIAM et al v. IMC CREDIT SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2010cv00596
Plaintiff:
KELLIE GILLIAM and LOYD GILLIAM
Defendant:
IMC CREDIT SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
