Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Bousquet v. Citigroup, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Bousquet
Defendant:
Citigroup, Inc., Radius Global Solutions LLC and Citigroup, Inc. doing business as Citibank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Burgos v. Radius Global Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00855
Plaintiff:
Marilu Burgos
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions, LLC and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stanton v. Radius Global Solutions LLC
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Vieneese Stanton
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jose Vargas v. Radius Global Solutions LLC
as 2:2022cv08252
Plaintiff:
Jose Vargas
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gutierrez v. Radius Global Solutions LLC
as 3:2022cv06549
Plaintiff:
Romeo Gutierrez
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Santiago v. Radius Global Solutions LLC
as 1:2022cv02108
Plaintiff:
Francoise Santiago and Francoise Scaletta Santiago
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brown v. Radius Global Solutions, LLC
as 1:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Heahter Brown and Heather Brown
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Diaz v. Radius Global Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Ismael Diaz
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions, LLC and American Express National Bank
Griffin v. Radius Global Solutions, LLC
as 2:2021cv00130
Plaintiff:
Robert. Griffin
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FLORENCE v. RADIUS GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, LLC,
as 4:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
PHILIP FLORENCE
Defendant:
RADIUS GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, LLC,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
