Cases 1 - 10 of 16
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Village of Palmrya
as 4:2021cv03032
Defendant:
Village of Palmrya
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0251
Stalnaker v. Bonnell et al
as 4:2020cv03100
Defendant:
Vanguard Services Company A, Merril Investment Group, James John Jorissen and others
Plaintiff:
John D. Stalnaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sarpy County v. Crown Castle USA Inc et al
as 8:2020cv00325
Plaintiff:
Sarpy County and Sarpy County, Nebraska
Defendant:
T-Mobile Central LLC and Crown Castle USA Inc
Boehm v. Livefree Emergency Response, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00208
Defendant:
Internet Listing Solutions, LLC, T Wilson Investments LLC, Livefree Emergency Response, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Boehm
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0251
United States of America v. Tran
as 4:2015cv03036
Defendant:
Scott T. Tran
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Injunctions against fraud
Maehr v. Internal Revenue Service
as 8:2008cv00214
Petitioner:
Jeffrey T. Maehr
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Maehr v. Internal Revenue Service
as 8:2008cv00213
Petitioner:
Jeffrey T. Maehr
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Maehr v. Internal Revenue Service
as 8:2008cv00190
Petitioner:
Jeffrey T. Maehr
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Yang v. Heinauer et al
as 4:2007cv03258
Plaintiff:
Jin Ping Yang
Defendant:
Gerard Heinauer, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Michael Mukaskey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fang et al v. Heinauer et al
as 4:2007cv03238
Plaintiff:
Liang Fang and Jun Cheng
Defendant:
Gerard Heinauer, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Peter D. Keisler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
