Other Statutory Actions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 24-1334
Plaintiff: CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant: NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
The People of the State of New York, by Letitia James v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00659
Plaintiff: The People of the State of New York, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and The People of the State of New York, by Letitia James
Defendant: CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 2:2024mc50259
Defendant: STRATFS, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Keith Ellison and others
Plaintiff: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Letitia James, People of the State of New York and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. Stratfs, LLC (f/k/a Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC), et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00040
Defendant: Stratfs, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, State of Colorado and others
Petitioner: Fidelis Legal Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6102 Telemarketing rules
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al. v. Stratfs, LLC et al.
as 2:2024ms00010
Defendant: Stratfs, LLC, Strategic Client Support, Anchor Client Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Receiver: Thomas W. McNamara
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 23-1836
Plaintiff / Appellee: CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant: NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Roomster Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07389
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission, People of The State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant: Roomster Corp., John Shriber, Roman Zaks and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 45 Federal Trade Commission Act (unfair or deceptive acts)
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. Credit Acceptance Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, People of the State of New York, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and People of The State of New York
Defendant: Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. RD Legal Funding LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00890
Defendant: RD Legal Funding LLC, RD Legal Funding Partners, LP and RD Legal Finance, LLC
Plaintiff: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and People of the State of New York
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Roni Dersovitz
Not Classified By Court: Christopher LoPalo
Interested Party: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Amicus Curiae: Proposed Amicus Curie Plaintiff Settlement Class and American Legal Finance Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. MoneyGram International, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03256
Plaintiff: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and People Of The State Of New York, By Letitia James
Defendant: MoneyGram International, Inc., MoneyGram Payment System, Inc. and MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Fund Transfer Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?