Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Komor v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00293
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Christy Goldfuss, Mick Mulvancy and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Robert Komor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gallagher & Kennedy PA v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2016cv04447
Plaintiff:
Gallagher & Kennedy PA
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Nokia of America Corporation, Prudential Overall Supply and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
ITT LLC, United States Department of Energy, American Linen Supply Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
CEMEX Materials LLC v. Statler Ready Mixed Concrete Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00670
Plaintiff:
CEMEX Materials LLC
Defendant:
Statler Ready Mixed Concrete Company, Inc. , Frederick R. Statler , Holly C. Statler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
The People of The United States of America et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2010cv08122
Plaintiff:
People of The United States of America, Dee Thomas Murphy and National Standards Enforcement Agency
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Clyde Allen Andress, Charles Yager and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
National Standards Enforcement Agency et al v. Nyberg et al
as 3:2010cv08017
Plaintiff:
Dee Thomas Murphy
Defendant:
Margaret Nyberg and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
National Standards Enforcement Agency et al v. Barlow et al
as 3:2010cv08015
Plaintiff:
National Standards Enforcement Agency, New Water Source Utilities-LHC and Dee Thomas Murphy
Defendant:
Dean Barlow, Martha Barlow and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
National Standards Enforcement Agency et al v. McAtlin et al
as 3:2010cv08019
Plaintiff:
National Standards Enforcement Agency, New Water Source Utilities-LHC and Dee Thomas Murphy
Defendant:
David McAtlin and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
