Cases 21 - 30 of 162
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 23-30445
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Vivek H. Murthy, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae:
Children's Health Defense, Leland Stanford Junior University, Electronic Frontier Foundation and others
State of Florida v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 23-11644
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellant:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Classified By Court:
THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE, CANIZARES LAW GROUP LLC, CATHOLIC CHARITIES LEGAL SERVICES and others
State of Florida v. USA, et al
as 23-11528
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE, THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE and others
Not Classified By Court:
THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
SHAMI JEWELRY, LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv02376
Plaintiff:
Shami Jewelry, LLC, SHAMI JEWELRY, INC, SHAMI FINE WATCHMAKING and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
National Shooting Sports Foundation Inc v. Ferguson
as 2:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. and National Shooting Sports Foundation Inc
Defendant:
Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney General of the State of Washington and Robert W Ferguson
Intervenor Defendant:
Alliance for Gun Responsibility
Amicus Curiae:
Everytown for Gun Safety, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
John Doe, et al v. USDOJ, et al
as 23-55231
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, # 1, # 2, # 3, # 4 and ALLIANCE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL SEX OFFENSE LAWS
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity
John Doe, et al v. USDOJ, et al
as 23-55232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE, # 1, # 2, # 3, # 4 and ALLIANCE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL SEX OFFENSE LAWS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity
Acevedo v. Trent Law Firm et al
as 1:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Trent Law Firm and Marc P. Trent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC. v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, JANET COIT and others
Intervenor Defendant:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
