Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Valentin et al v. Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2020cv01836
Defendant: Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli, Acting Secretary Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff: Miguel Angel Valentin and Yeni A Garzon Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
VELAZQUEZ QUINONEZ v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 9:2020cv80528
Plaintiff: Luis VELAZQUEZ QUINONEZ and Luis Velasquez Quinonez
Defendant: Field Office Dir. Michael W. Meade, Attorney General William Barr, Henry Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Westreicher et al v. United States Attorney General et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00191
Plaintiff: Kathryn Elizabeth Westreicher and Erick Ronald Westreicher Flores
Defendant: Chad Wolf, Mark Hansen, Kenneth T Cuccinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Zander Ramat v. Kirstjen Nielsen, et al
as 18-56190
Plaintiff - Appellant: ZANDER RAMAT
Defendant - Appellee: KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service, MELISSA MAXIM, Field Office Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, San Diego and others
Esteban Aleman Gonzalez, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-16465
Plaintiff - Appellee: ESTEBAN ALEMAN GONZALEZ and EDUARDO GUTIERREZ SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellant: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, JAMES MCHENRY, Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice and others
Caplash v. Johnson
as 18-1523
Plaintiff - Appellee: Jolly Manoj Caplash
Defendant - Appellant: Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Leon Rodriguez, Director, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service and others
Dilley v. Johnson
as 18-441
Plaintiff - Appellant: Mark Dilley
Defendant - Appellee: Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security
Defendant: Rand Beers, Secretary (Acting) Department of Homeland Security Agency, Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, John F. Kelly, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Ghanimeh v. Secretary of State, U.S. Department of State et al
as 1:2016cv03055
Plaintiff: Misan Said Ghanimeh
Defendant: Secretary of State, U.S. Department of State, Assistant Secretary of Consular Affairs, US Department of State, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Deepak Budhathoki, et al v. Jeh Johnson, Secretary, DHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-51449
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEEPAK BUDHATHOKI, on behalf of themselves and all others situated persons, CLESMY E. CANALES GONZALES, on behalf of themselves and all others situated persons and KATHERINE YURLIETH TURCIOS-PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee: JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Director of Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, LEON RODRIGUEZ, Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his official capacity and MARIO R. ORTIZ, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services District Director for San Antonio, in his official capacity
Movimiento Democracia, Inc., et al v. Secretary, Department of Home, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16732
Plaintiff - Appellant: MOVIMIENTO DEMOCRACIA, INC., LIBAN CONCEPCION LIO, ALEXEIS LEYVA and others
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?