Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Raymond Parkman v. State of California, et al
as 24-10299
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND GRANT PARKMAN
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chavez v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Koby Chavez
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Parkman v. State of California et al
as 8:2023cv02952
Plaintiff:
Raymond Grant Parkman
Defendant:
State of California Franchise Tax Board doing business as Agent John Does 1-100 and Deputy Assistant Attorney General doing business as David A. Hubbert
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Louisiana et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
U S Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of California, California Water Resources Control Board, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 23-30445
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Vivek H. Murthy, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae:
Children's Health Defense, Leland Stanford Junior University, Electronic Frontier Foundation and others
Amalgamated Transit Union International, et al v. USDOL, et al
as 23-15617
Plaintiff:
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION INTERNATIONAL, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 192, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 256 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
Amalgamated Transit Union International, et al v. USDOL, et al
as 23-15503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION INTERNATIONAL, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 192, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 256 and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Save the Colorado, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-15247
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAVE THE COLORADO, LIVING RIVERS and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11086
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia, Brady, 16 Major Cities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
