Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Homestead Repair & Renovation, Inc. v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2021cv00388
Plaintiff:
Homestead Repair & Renovation, Inc., Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and Homestead Repair & Renovation, Inc.
Defendant:
Byron W. Brown, City of Buffalo and Kevin Helfer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
TUNSKAI PROPERTIES, LLC on behalf of itself and all other Class Members similarly situated v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv04004
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS
Plaintiff:
TUNSKAI PROPERTIES, LLC on behalf of itself and all other Class Members similarly situated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keep Chicago Livable, et al v. City of Chicago
as 17-2846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEEP CHICAGO LIVABLE, an Illinois not -for -profit corporation, BENJAMIN T. WOLF, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, SUSAN MALLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Keep Chicago Livable, et al v. City of Chicago
as 17-2846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEEP CHICAGO LIVABLE, an Illinois not -for -profit corporation, BENJAMIN T. WOLF, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, SUSAN MALLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Arlene Rosenblatt v. City of Santa Monica, et al
as 17-55879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARLENE ROSENBLATT, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA MONICA, a municipal corporation and THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA, a governing body
Damian Stinnie v. Richard Holcomb
as 17-1740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIAN STINNIE, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DEMETRICE MOORE, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ROBERT TAYLOR, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD D. HOLCOMB, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
Keep Chicago Livable, et al v. City of Chicago
as 17-1656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEEP CHICAGO LIVABLE, an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, BENJAMIN T. WOLF, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, SUSAN MALLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Niya Kenny v. Alan Wilson
as 17-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIYA KENNY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, TAUREAN NESMITH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, GIRLS ROCK CHARLESTON, INCORPORATED, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, J. ALTON CANNON, JR., in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Charleston County, SC; on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, GREGORY G. MULLEN, in his official capacity as the Chief of the Police Department of the City of Charleston, SC; on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and others
William Newton, et al v. Duke Energy Florida, LLC, et al
as 17-10080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM B. NEWTON and NOREEN ALLISON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Florida profit corporation
Cruz v. Zucker
as 16-4311
Plaintiff:
I.H., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, N.V., Legal Guardian of S.V., a minor, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and S.V., a minor child by N.V., Legal Guardian, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Angie Cruz, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Ares Kpaka, Riya Christie and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Howard Zucker, as Commissioner of the Department of Health
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
