Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Doe (JDR) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00651
Plaintiff: John Doe (JDR)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (DEA) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00640
Plaintiff: John Doe (DEA)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (JCA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00634
Plaintiff: John Doe #1 (JCA), John Doe #2 (BA), John Doe #3 (JRA) and others
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duff et al v. City of Crossville, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv00037
Plaintiff: Christopher Duff, Starlene Gilbert, Boyd Alan Kearley and others
Defendant: City of Crossville, Tennessee, Koby Wilson, Zach Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 v. Lee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00592
Plaintiff: John Doe #1
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Rausch
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 v. Lee et al
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff: John Doe #1
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #14 v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv01075
Plaintiff: John Doe #14
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #13 v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00831
Plaintiff: John Doe #13
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?