Cases 41 - 50 of 1,284
vang v. county of trinity et al
as 5:2023cv01848
Plaintiff:
xia vang
Defendant:
Sheriff sheriff county of trinity and Trinity County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PS) Malik et al v. Iqbal et al
as 2:2023cv01462
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Younas Malik and Nazia Jabeen Iqbal
Defendant:
Mohammad Ahsan Iqbal, Sadia Naseem, Shazia Jabeen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
(PS) Rigor v. Santa Clara County et al
as 2:2023cv01679
Plaintiff:
Soraya Maria Rigor
Defendant:
Santa Clara County, Fernandez Libby, The Sacramento LGBT Community Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Malberg v. Cashen et al
as 5:2022cv01788
Plaintiff:
Martin Malberg
Defendant:
Robert Cashen, Christine Guerra, Temo Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Watkin et al
as 1:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Daymon Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Watkin, Richard McCrow, Thomas J. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keading et al v. Keading
as 3:2023cv03036
Plaintiff:
Hilja Keading and Keading Family Trust
Defendant:
Kenton Keading
The Personal Care Products Council v. Bonta
as 2:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
The Personal Care Products Council
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Antioch University v. Rob Bonta et al
as 2:2023cv05341
Plaintiff:
Antioch University
Defendant:
ROBERT ANDRES BONTA, Stewart Knox, Katrina Hagen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Richard J Koppel v. Robert Bonta et al
as 8:2023cv00813
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Koppel
Defendant:
Robert Bonta, Don Barnes and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Craig II v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
as 3:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lee Craig II
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2403 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
