Cases 1 - 8 of 8
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Jackson City Branch of the NAACP and others
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Sean Tindell, Bo Luckey and others
Petitioner:
JXN Undivided Coalition, Mississippi Votes, PEOPLES ADVOCACY INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Bennie Thompson, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Tennant et al v. Featherstone et al
as 4:2019cv04214
Defendant:
Mark Cady, Stephanie "the Hulk Rose, Brent Appel and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tennant and Kenneth Tennant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Andrew v. Herring, et al.
as 3:2017cv00373
Defendant:
Mark Herring , LARRY T. BAILEY , ROY E. BOSWELL and others
Plaintiff:
Colin Andrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANDREW v. HERRING et al
as 1:2016cv01775
Defendant:
MARK HERRING , LARRY T. BAILEY , ROY E. BOSWELL and others
Plaintiff:
COLIN ANDREW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosen v. Bozek et al
as 0:2013cv61316
Plaintiff:
Samuel D. Rosen
Defendant:
Allen Bozek, Charlotte Engleman, Robert Guida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colin Andrew v. Matt Lohr
as 11-1086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLIN ANDREW
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT LOHR, Commissioner, Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, THOMAS MOOREHEAD, President, Sterling BMW, SALLY WOODSON SPIGLE, President, Rick Woodson Honda and others
Andrew v. Blank et al
as 3:2010cv00353
Plaintiff:
Colin Andrew
Defendant:
Jonathan Blank, Tom Haymore, Lynn Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
