Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Ponder v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv00784
Plaintiff:
Marissa V. Ponder
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ponder v. Wild
as 2:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Hans-Peter Wild
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ponder Environmental Services, Inc. v. Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00471
Defendant:
Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. and Lonestar West Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Ponder Environmental Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ponder Environmental Services, Inc. v. Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2019at00197
Defendant:
Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. and Lonestar West Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Ponder Environmental Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ponder v. Wild
as 2:2018cv01604
Defendant:
Hans-Peter Wild
Plaintiff:
Michael H Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Primrose School Franchising Company v. Ponder
as 5:2017cv00856
Plaintiff:
Primrose School Franchising Company
Defendant:
Troy Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOT USED
as 2:2016cv02304
Defendant:
Michael H Ponder and Hans-Peter Wild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Ponder v. Wild
as 2:2016cv02305
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Ponder
Defendant:
Dr. Hans Peter Wild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Progressive Lighting & Energy Solutions, Inc. v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
as 2:2016cv06167
Petitioner:
In & Out Welders, Inc. and Progressive Lighting & Energy Solutions, Inc.
Unknown:
Taylor Christopher Bartlett, Joseph Bradley Ponder and Oscar Martin Price, IV
Respondent:
Sunbelt Rentals, Inc
SCRUTCHENS v. MUNRO et al
as 3:2016cv04207
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCRUTCHENS
Defendant:
MARK E. MUNRO, MARK F. DURFEE, CHARLES K. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
