Cases 11 - 16 of 16
State of Georgia, et al v. Amgen, Inc, et al
as 10-1955
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF GEORGIA and KASSIE WESTMORELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC, INTERNATIONAL NEPHROLOGY NETWORK, AMERISOURCEBERGEN SPECIALTY GROUP and others
Defendant:
WEBMD HEALTH CORP., MEDSCAPE, LLC, WYETH and others
U.S. Bank National Association v. Amina Maliek, et al
as 10-50588
Plaintiff - Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the Registered Holders of FMAC Loan Receivables Trust 2000-A, a special purpose business trust organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, by Capmark Finance Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
AMINA MALIEK, an Individual, AMIRALI MAVANI, an Individual, DOLLAR VALUE, INC., a Texas Corporation and others
CARPENTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY et al v. PRESTON
as 1:2009cv05021
Plaintiff:
CARPENTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY, CARPENTERS PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY, CARPENTERS SAVINGS FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and others
Defendant:
HENRY R. PRESTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
The Kenyotta Erevu Manuel Nobility Trust v. The State of Delaware
as 1:2009cv00588
Plaintiff:
The Kenyotta Erevu Manuel Nobility Trust
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Kenyotta Erevu Manuel
Defendant:
The State of Delaware
ThirdParty Defendant:
The State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner v. Arelma, Inc., et al
as 09-15573
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, INCORPORATED, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business in New York, New York
Defendant - Appellant:
ARELMA, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Panama with a permanent address at Ave. Justo Alosemena y Calle 41 Este, No. 40-59 Pte al Colegio Immeculada, Panama 1.Rep.de Panama, and a mailing address at c/o Suntrust Invenstment Co and PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK
Defendant:
SUNTRUST INVESTMENT CO., S.A., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Switzerland with an address at rue de Jargonnant 2, P.O. Box 76, 1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland and ENC CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland, with an address at 232 Paula Lynn Drive, Silver Spring, MD0904
Defendant - Appellee:
THE ESTATE OF ROGER ROXAS, receiver, Felix Dacanay, GOLDEN BUDHA CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Georgia, with a registered office at 710 West First Street, Blue Ridge, Georgia 30513, and a mailing address at 260 Carrollton St., Buchanan, GA 30113 and MARIANO J. PIMENTAL, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated
Merrill Lynch, v. Arelna, Inc., et al
as 04-16401
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, INCORPORATED, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business in New York, New York
Defendant:
ENC CORPORATION, SUNTRUST INVESTMENT CO., S.A., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Switzerland with an address at rue de Jargonnant 2, P.O. Box 76, 1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland, JOHN K. BURNS, a citizen of the United States, with an address at 300 Wacker Drive, Suite, 900, Chicago, Illinois, 60606; THE ESTATE OF FERDINAND E. MARCO; IMELDA R. MARCO; FERDINAND R. MARCO, JR.; MARIA IMELDA MARCOS; IRENE MARCOS ARANETA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ARELMA, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Panama with a permanent address at Ave. Justo Alosemena y Calle 41 Este, No. 40-59 Pte al Colegio Immeculada, Panama 1.Rep.de Panama, and a mailing address at c/o Suntrust Invenstment Co and PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIANO J. PIMENTAL, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
