Cases 11 - 20 of 232
Liang v. Baszucki et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Luejia Liang
Defendant:
David Baszucki, Gregory Baszucki, Christopher Carvalho and others
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Wong et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Howard Wong and Juan Martinez-Nicasio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Ristea v. Botteri et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Octavian Ristea
Defendant:
Philippe Botteri, Daniel Dines, Carl Eschenbach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Williston v. Alexander et al
as 8:2023cv03403
Plaintiff:
Darryl Williston
Defendant:
Ralph Alexander, John C. Bumgarner, Jr., Janet S. Wong and others
Bowling v. Dines et al
as 1:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
Maren K. Bowling
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Nominal Defendant:
UiPath, Inc.
In re UiPath, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2023cv01385
Plaintiff:
Michael Bernstein, Maren K. Bowling and Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Nominal Defendant:
UiPath, Inc.
Browning v. Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv03293
Plaintiff:
William Browning
Defendant:
Ralph Alexander, John C. Bumgarner, Jr., Janet S. Wong and others
Browning v. Alexander et al
as 8:2023cv03293
Plaintiff:
William Browning
Defendant:
Ralph Alexander, John C. Bumgarner, Jr., Janet S. Wong and others
Ellis, Bandt, Birkin, Kollins & Wong d/b/a Desert Radiology v. Chin
as 5:2023cv05918
Plaintiff:
Ellis, Bandt, Birkin, Kollins & Wong d/b/a Desert Radiology
Defendant:
Hubert Chin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Carla Ciuffo v. Christine Dagousset et al
as 2:2023cv09712
Plaintiff:
Carla Ciuffo
Defendant:
Olaplex Holdings, Inc., Christine Dagousset, Deirdre Findlay and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
