Contract Cases
Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Lindsey et al v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv01096
Plaintiff: James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant: Dallas Area Rapid Transit and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Lindsey et al v. ATU International et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00232
Plaintiff: James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant: ATU International, ATU International, Amalgamated Transit Union Local Division 1635 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Otero-Burgos, et al v. Inter American Unive, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2501
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDWIN OTERO-BURGOS, NIEVELYN MARRERO-PENA, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP, Otero-Marrero and others
Defendant - Appellee: INTER AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, IRENE FERNANDEZ-APONTE, JUAN NEGRON-BERRIOS and others
: , , and others
Provident Savings Bank FSB v. Santiago Berrios-Bones et al
as 5:2007cv00451
Plaintiff: Provident Savings Bank FSB and Provident Savings Bank FSB
Defendant: Santiago Berrios-Bones, Santiago Berrios-Bones, Sixta Valentin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Provident Savings Bank FSB v. Santiago Berrios-Bones et al
as 5:2007cv00356
Plaintiff: Provident Savings Bank FSB and Provident Savings Bank FSB
Defendant: Santiago Berrios-Bones, Santiago Berrios-Bones, Sixta Valentin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Berrios-Bones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00525
Plaintiff: Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B.
Defendant: Santiago Berrios-Bones, Sixta Valentin and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?