Cases 21 - 30 of 47
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC. v. GARFINKEL et al
as 2:2017cv03277
Plaintiff:
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID GARFINKEL and JOSEPH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medtronic Inc, et al v. Gannon, et al
as 0:2017cv00943
Plaintiff:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. , Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc.
Defendant:
Patrick B. Gannon , DePuy Spine, LLC and DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SYNTHES, INC. et al v. CLARK et al
as 2:2017cv01218
Plaintiff:
SYNTHES, INC. , SYNTHES USA, LLC and DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
Defendant:
STEVEN CLARK and DAVID FOWLKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC. v. GLOBUS MEDICAL INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01068
Plaintiff:
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
Defendant:
GLOBUS MEDICAL INC. , MICHAEL FOLEY , JEREMY D. LEARY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SYNTHES, INC. et al v. GREGORIS
as 2:2016cv06255
Plaintiff:
SYNTHES, INC. , DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. and DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
Defendant:
DANIEL GREGORIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES INC v. NOYES
as 2:2016cv00428
Plaintiff:
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES INC
Defendant:
MARTIN NOYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC. v. BARRETT
as 2:2016cv02532
Plaintiff:
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
Defendant:
PATRICK K. BARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC. v. TONI
as 2:2016cv02538
Plaintiff:
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
Defendant:
ROBERT A. TONI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SYNTHES, INC. et al v. MYERS
as 2:2014cv06625
Plaintiff:
SYNTHES, INC. , DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , SYNTHES USA, LLC and others
Defendant:
JAY MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC. v. JERNIGAN
as 2:2014cv04326
Plaintiff:
DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
Defendant:
DOUGLAS C. JERNIGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
