Contract Cases
Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Fifth Third Bank, an Ohio banking corporation, successor by merger with Fifth Third Bank, a Michigan banking corporation v. Elmhurst Autoplex, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv07322
Plaintiff: Fifth Third Bank, an Ohio banking corporation, successor by merger with Fifth Third Bank, a Michigan banking corporation and Fifth Third Bank, an Ohio banking corporation, successor by merger with Fifth Third Bank, a Michigan banking corporation
Defendant: Elmhurst Autoplex, Inc., Michael L Weiner and John Desimone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract None
Amalgamated Transit Union, division 618 et al v. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority
as 1:2009cv00399
Plaintiff: Amalgamated Transit Union, division 618, Amalgamated Transit Union, division 618, Henry B. Sheehan and others
Defendant: Rhode Island Public Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Type: Contract None
Aviles et al v. York Claims Service, Inc.
as 1:2007cv07043
Plaintiff: Desimone Aviles and Shorter & Oxamendi, LLP
Defendant: York Claims Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HICKS et al v. DESIMONE, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01454
Plaintiff: ERICA A. HICKS and GLORIA JOHNSON
Defendant: DESIMONE, INC., DESIMONE, INC. and DAVID JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
DESIMONE, AVILESM SHORTER & OXAMENDI LLP v. MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2007cv01394
Plaintiff: DESIMONE, AVILESM SHORTER & OXAMENDI LLP
Defendant: RICHARD MONTGOMERY, KATHLEEN MONTGOMERY and LOIS SCHNEIDER REALTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dorsey et al v. Desimone et al
as 9:2007cv80170
Plaintiff: James H. Dorsey and Dorsey Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant: Rocco Desimone, Rocco Desimone, Shirley D. Sack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?