Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Sarkissian Mason, Inc. v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
as 13-3052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sarkissian Mason, Inc., a Michigan corporation and Automatic LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Defendant - Appellee:
Enterprise Holdings, Inc., a Missouri Corporation
Julie Williams v. Enterprise Holdings Inc, et al
as 13-2045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIE WILLIAMS, On Behalf of Herself and All Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC, FKA Enterprise Rent -A-Car, EAN SERVICES LLC and ENTERPRISE LEASING CO OF PHILADELPHIA LLC, FKA Enterprise Rent-A-Car
WILLIAMS v. ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05531
Plaintiff:
JULIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC. , EAN SERVICES, LLC and ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sarkissian Mason, Inc. et al v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2011cv09472
Plaintiff:
Sarkissian Mason, Inc. and Automatic LLC
Defendant:
Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Douma v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv60835
Plaintiff:
Michael Douma
Defendant:
Enterprise Holdings, Inc. , John Does # 1-10 and Enterprise Leasing Company of Florida, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Douma v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv07623
Plaintiff:
Michael Douma
Defendant:
Enterprise Holdings, Inc. and John Does # 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Santo v. ANC Sports Enterprises Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2009cv09788
Plaintiff:
Michael Santo
Defendant:
ANC Sports Enterprises Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Talley C-Store Enterprise #1, Inc. et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
as 1:2008cv00515
Plaintiff:
Talley C-Store Enterprise #1, Inc. and Talley Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
