Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv08253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cives Corporation v. WSP Mountain Enterprises Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05428
Plaintiff:
Cives Corporation
Defendant:
WSP Mountain Enterprises Inc. and WAP Cantor Seinuk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cantor Colburn LLP v. Cardiolumen, Inc
as 3:2012cv00719
Plaintiff:
Cantor Colburn LLP
Defendant:
Cardiolumen, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avenue CLO IV, Ltd, et al v. Bank of America, NA
as 12-11815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AVENUE CLO FUND LTD., AVENUE CLO IV, LTD., CASPIAN SELECT CREDIT MASTER FUND, LTD. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, NA
William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC v. Cantor et al
as 1:2011cv24470
Plaintiff:
William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC
Defendant:
Andres Cantor and Futbol de Primera, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cantor Colburn LLP v. Ozment et al
as 3:2011cv01700
Plaintiff:
Cantor Colburn LLP
Defendant:
Alden Ozment, US Foam, Inc. and USF Equipment and Services, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CANTOR et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2011cv04177
Plaintiff:
ANDREW CANTOR and ELYSE CANTOR
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allegiance (DC) 1150 18th Street LLC v. Cantor Fitzgerald Securities Corp.
as 1:2011cv02396
Plaintiff:
Allegiance (DC) 1150 18th Street LLC
Defendant:
Cantor Fitzgerald Securities Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Hunt v Cantor
as 4:2011cv00869
Plaintiff:
Rodney P Hunt
Defendant:
Richard Allan Cantor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Basso Holdings Ltd. et al v. Sofinnova Venture Partners VII, L.P. et al
as 1:2011cv00891
Plaintiff:
Basso Holdings Ltd. and Basso Global ARB Holding Fund Ltd.
Defendant:
Sofinnova Venture Partners VII, L.P. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
