Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Harwood v. Crestar Mortgage et al
as 2:2012cv01067
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Michele Harwood
Defendant:
Crestar Mortgage , Suntrust Mortgage , Nationstar Mortgage LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wang v. Page et al
as 4:2012cv01785
Plaintiff:
Judy Wang
Defendant:
Larry Page , Sergey Brin , Eric E Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wang v. Page et al
as 5:2012cv01785
Plaintiff:
Judy Wang
Defendant:
Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Eric E Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Barton et al
as 5:2012cv01558
Plaintiff:
Mary Davis
Defendant:
Richard N Barton, A. George Battle, Charles H. Giancarlo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Soulis v. Hastings et al
as 5:2012cv00927
Defendant:
Neil D. Hunt, Ann Mather, Richard N Barton and others
Plaintiff:
Antonios S Soulis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRANKENTEK RESIDENTIAL SYSTEMS, LLC v. BUERGER et al
as 2:2012cv00767
Plaintiff:
FRANKENTEK RESIDENTIAL SYSTEMS, LLC
Defendant:
REID BUERGER, KRISTA BUERGER, HARNER MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gallas v. Schmidt et al
as 5:2011cv04270
Plaintiff:
Avrohom Gallas
Defendant:
Eric E Schmidt, Lawrence E Page, Sergey Brin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re Google Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 4:2011cv04248
Defendant:
Larry Page , Sergey Brin , Eric E Schmidt and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia M McKenna
Consol_plaintiff:
Avrohom Gallas and James Clem
Consol_defendant:
Ann Mather
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gallas v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2011cv04270
Plaintiff:
Avrohom Gallas
Defendant:
Eric E Schmidt , Lawrence E Page , Sergey Brin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mather et al v. Lake Austin Properties I, Ltd.
as 6:2011cv00658
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mather and Lynn Mather
Defendant:
Lake Austin Properties I, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
