Cases 51 - 60 of 147
IBEW-NECA Southwestern Health and Benefit Fund et al v. Simard Electric Services LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01867
Plaintiff:
IBEW-NECA Southwestern Health and Benefit Fund and National Electrical Benefit Fund
Defendant:
Simard Electric Services LLC and Granite Re Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension Fund et al v. H. E. Butt Grocery Company et al
as 4:2014cv01342
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension Fund , Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Fund , Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Educational Program and others
Garnishee:
H. E. Butt Grocery Company
Debtor:
South Texas Elevator, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alterra America Insurance Company v. Laborers' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
Alterra America Insurance Company
Defendant:
Laborers' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago and Michael W. Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re ACTOS Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013cv09244
Plaintiff:
199 SEIU-National Benefit Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health a and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, City of Providence, Rhode Island, Crosby Tugs, LLC and others
Defendant:
Actavis plc, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Mylan, Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc. and American Sales Company, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
In Re: LiborBased Financial In
as 13-3565
Plaintiff:
FTC Capital GMBH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, FTC Futures Fund SICAV, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ellen Gelboim, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and Linda Zacher
Defendant:
Lloyds Banking Group plc
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Barclays Bank Plc., Citibank NA and others
Central California IBEW/NECA Pension Trust et al v. Derek Ehinger Electric et al
as 5:2013cv03943
Plaintiff:
Central California IBEW/NECA Pension Trust , IBEW/NECA Family Medical Care Plan , San Luis Obispo County Joint Electrical Apprenticeship and Training Trust and others
Defendant:
Derek Ehinger Electric and Derek Ehinger
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
IBEW-NECA Southwestern Health and Benefit Fund et al v. CCCC Inc
as 3:2013cv01889
Plaintiff:
IBEW-NECA Southwestern Health and Benefit Fund and National Electrical Benefit Fund
Defendant:
CCCC Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
IBEW-NECA Southwestern Health and Benefit Fund et al v. Scott Moore Enterprises Inc
as 3:2013cv01720
Plaintiff:
IBEW-NECA Southwestern Health and Benefit Fund , National Electrical Benefit Fund , IBEW Local Union No 479 Annuity/401(k) Fund and others
Defendant:
Scott Moore Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
The Trustees of the Eighth District Electrical Pension and Benefit Funds v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2013cv00117
Plaintiff:
The Trustees of the Eighth District Electrical Pension and Benefit Funds
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER v. 1199 SEIU GREATER NY BENEFIT FUND et al
as 3:2012cv04145
Plaintiff:
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER
Defendant:
1199 SEIU GREATER NY BENEFIT FUND , JOHN/JANE DOES, 1-10, ABC CORP., 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
