Cases 71 - 80 of 145
Citadel Securities LLC et al v. Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04549
Defendant:
Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. , International Securities Exchange, LLC, NASDAQ OMX PHLX and others
Plaintiff:
Citadel Securities LLC , Group One Trading LP , Ronin Capital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Relay IP Inc. v. NASDAQ OMX Group Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01080
Plaintiff:
Relay IP Inc.
Defendant:
NASDAQ OMX Group Inc. and NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Womac v. The NASDAQ OMX Group Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01999
Plaintiff:
Brian D Womac
Defendant:
The NASDAQ OMX Group Inc and The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Nisser v. New York Stock Exchange
as 13-886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Glenk Nisser
Defendant - Appellee:
New York Stock Exchange, Euronext, European and others
Womac v. The NASDAQ OMX Group Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00454
Plaintiff:
Brian D Womac
Defendant:
The NASDAQ OMX Group Inc and The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
S. et al v. NASDAQ OMX Flexible Benefits Program et al
as 2:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
William S. and Hunter S.
Defendant:
NASDAQ OMX Flexible Benefits Program, NASDAQ OMX Group, The and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Fleming v. The Nasdaq OMX Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv09308
Plaintiff:
Janis Fleming
Defendant:
The Nasdaq OMX Group, Inc. and The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Fleming v. The Nasdaq OMX Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv03514
Plaintiff:
Janis Fleming
Defendant:
The Nasdaq OMX Group, Inc. and The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
