Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cortes v. Twenty-First Century Fox Ameri
as 18-414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Francisco Cortes
Defendant - Appellee:
21st Century Fox America, Inc. and Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cortes v. Twenty-First Century Fox America, Inc.
as 1:2017cv05634
Plaintiff:
Francisco Cortes
Defendant:
Twenty-First Century Fox America, Inc. , 21st Century Fox America, Inc. , Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Core Litigation Trust v. Apollo Global Management, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02658
Plaintiff:
Core Litigation Trust
Defendant:
Apollo Global Management, LLC, Apollo Global Management L.L.C., Apollo Global Securities, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Core Litigation Trust v. Apollo Global Management, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00927
Plaintiff:
Core Litigation Trust
Defendant:
Apollo Global Management, LLC, Apollo Global Securities, LLC, Apollo Management Holdings GP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Wax et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10285
Plaintiff:
Barry Wax and Kenneth Rosen
Defendant:
FanDuel Inc., DraftKings, Inc., SAAHIL SUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOMEZ et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10239
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GOMEZ , Ricardo Alejandro Garcia and John Gerecs
Defendant:
FanDuel Inc. , DraftKings, Inc., SAAHIL SUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wax et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv24450
Plaintiff:
Barry Wax and Kenneth Rosen
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc., DraftKings, Inc., SAAHIL SUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOMEZ et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv23858
Defendant:
BDS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, PAYSAFECARD.COM USA, INC, MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Gerecs, ANTONIO GOMEZ and Ricardo Alejandro Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
