Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Caceres et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jeydi Ramos Caceres and Karol Ortega Munguia
Defendant:
Rogelio Eduardo Rodriguez, Ramtex Recycling, Inc. and Berkley National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Estate of Carmen Coral Morales-Rodger et al v. CPC Carolina PR, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01397
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Rodriguez-Morales, Patricia Maria Rodriguez-Morales, Fernando Julio Rodriguez-Morales and others
Defendant:
KRB Universal Investments, LLC, CPC Carolina PR, LLC, Puerto Rico CVS Pharmacy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eduardo Rodriguez et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2018cv07858
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Rodriguez, Francisco Mendivil Espinoza and Leticia Lopez Hernandez
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100, Inclusive, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eduardo Rodriguez et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 5:2018cv01905
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Rodriguez, Francisco Mendivil Espinoza and Leticia Lopez Hernandez
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Does 1 through 100, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Leal et al v. Paramount Restaurants Group Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00194
Plaintiff:
Michael Garcia , Alicia Longstreth , John Criado and others
Defendant:
Cory Strickland, Gary Strickland, Paramount Restaurants Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Organization of Assistance for Homeowners of California et al v. EMC Mortgage et al
as 8:2011cv00585
Plaintiff:
Paula Brennan, Puriza Burton, Norma Cabusas and others
Defendant:
Central Mortgage Company, Does and EMC Mortgage
First National Bank v. Rodriguez Berlanga
as 1:2007cv00174
Plaintiff:
First National Bank
Defendant:
Eduardo Rodriguez Berlanga
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
