Cases 1 - 7 of 7
IPS Avon Park Corporation, et al v. Kinder Morgan, Inc., et al
as 22-10547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IPS AVON PARK CORPORATION and D E JONES CONSULTING, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
KINDER MORGAN, INC., EL PASO LLC and MESQUITE INVESTORS, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated v. Kinder Morgan, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00176
Defendant:
St. Katherine Insurance Company PLC, World Auxiliary Insurance Company Limited, Turegum Insurance Company Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (Newport News Shipbuilding Division) and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
IPS Avon Park Corporation et al v. Kinder Morgan, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv01643
Defendant:
Mesquite Investors, L.L.C., Shady Hills Power Company, L.L.C., El Paso LLC and others
Plaintiff:
IPS Avon Park Corporation and D E Jones Consulting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FILING ERROR
as 1:2020cv00291
Defendant:
E & J HEALTHCARE, LLC, MENTIS NEURO SAN ANTONIO, LLC, & MENTIS NEURO EL PASO, LLC and Charlotte United HealthCare of Texas, Inc.
E & J Healthcare, LLC, et al v. United HealthCare of Texas, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00292
Plaintiff:
Mentis Neuro El Paso LLC, E & J Healthcare, LLC and Mentis Neuro San Antonio, LLC
Defendant:
United HealthCare of Texas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medline Industries, Inc v. Gruenepointe 1 Longview, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02325
Defendant:
GRUENEPOINTE 1 KEMP, LLC, GRUENEPOINTE HOLDINGS, LLC, OP OPS ARL TX, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Medline Industries, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. et al v. Patriot Pipeline, Inc.
as 4:2015cv03584
Defendant:
Patriot Pipeline, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. , Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., LLC , El Paso LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
