Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Matt N. Lassman SEP IRA, et al v. Furniture Brands International, et al
as 15-1484
Plaintiff:
Keith Carter, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Matt N. Lassman SEP IRA, Matt N. Lassman Traditional IRA, Matt N. Lassman Roth IRA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Furniture Brands International, Inc., Ralph P. Scozzafava and Vance C. Johnston
Carter v. Furniture Brands International, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01600
Plaintiff:
Keith Carter
Defendant:
Furniture Brands International, Inc., Ralph P. Scozzafava and Vance C. Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Furniture Brands International, Inc. v. Samuels
as 4:2013cv00500
Plaintiff:
Furniture Brands International, Inc.
Defendant:
Harry D. Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DRAGOO v. FURNITURE BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01846
Defendant:
BROYHILL FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC., BROYHILL RETAIL, INC. and FURNITURE BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. DRAGOO, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hold, of Hold-Thyssen, Inc. v. Lane Home Furnishings Retail, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv01764
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Hold
Defendant:
Lane Home Furnishings Retail, Inc. , Furniture Brands International, Inc. and Lane Furniture Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Furniture Brands International, Inc. et al v. Hatchett Hospitality, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00944
Plaintiff:
Furniture Brands International, Inc. , Lane Furniture Industries, Inc. and Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Hatchett Hospitality, Inc. and William G Hatchett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Furniture Brands International, Inc. v. Interior House A.G.
as 4:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
Furniture Brands International, Inc.
Defendant:
Interior House A.G.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
