Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pimental et al v. Axis Surplus Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv23992
Plaintiff:
Nestor Pimental and Janet Pimental
Defendant:
Axis Surplus Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company v. Hoagland, et al
as 3:2014cv01740
Plaintiff:
Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company
Defendant:
Olivia Elizabeth Cortes Pimental and Christina Hoagland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Pimental v. North Pointe Insurance Company et al
as 8:2013cv02774
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pimental
Defendant:
North Pointe Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeMedeiros et al v. Kirkhill-TA Co. Haskon Aerospace Division et al
as 1:2010cv10668
Plaintiff:
Mario DeMedeiros , Fernando Teixeira , Jose Pimental and others
Defendant:
Kirkhill-TA Co. Haskon Aerospace Division and United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America (UE) Local 204
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner v. Arelma, Inc., et al
as 09-15573
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, INCORPORATED, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business in New York, New York
Defendant - Appellant:
ARELMA, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Panama with a permanent address at Ave. Justo Alosemena y Calle 41 Este, No. 40-59 Pte al Colegio Immeculada, Panama 1.Rep.de Panama, and a mailing address at c/o Suntrust Invenstment Co and PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK
Defendant:
SUNTRUST INVESTMENT CO., S.A., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Switzerland with an address at rue de Jargonnant 2, P.O. Box 76, 1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland and ENC CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland, with an address at 232 Paula Lynn Drive, Silver Spring, MD0904
Defendant - Appellee:
THE ESTATE OF ROGER ROXAS, receiver, Felix Dacanay, GOLDEN BUDHA CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Georgia, with a registered office at 710 West First Street, Blue Ridge, Georgia 30513, and a mailing address at 260 Carrollton St., Buchanan, GA 30113 and MARIANO J. PIMENTAL, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated
Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. Siena Home Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv00385
Plaintiff:
Mid-Continent Casualty Company
Defendant:
Siena Home Corporation , Tina Metcalf , Gilberto Aguila and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. Siena Home Corporation et al
as 6:2008cv00723
Plaintiff:
Mid-Continent Casualty Company and Mid-Continent Casualty Company
Defendant:
Siena Home Corporation, Tina Metcalf, Gilberto Aguila and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Merrill Lynch, v. Arelna, Inc., et al
as 04-16401
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, INCORPORATED, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business in New York, New York
Defendant:
ENC CORPORATION, SUNTRUST INVESTMENT CO., S.A., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Switzerland with an address at rue de Jargonnant 2, P.O. Box 76, 1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland, JOHN K. BURNS, a citizen of the United States, with an address at 300 Wacker Drive, Suite, 900, Chicago, Illinois, 60606; THE ESTATE OF FERDINAND E. MARCO; IMELDA R. MARCO; FERDINAND R. MARCO, JR.; MARIA IMELDA MARCOS; IRENE MARCOS ARANETA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ARELMA, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Panama with a permanent address at Ave. Justo Alosemena y Calle 41 Este, No. 40-59 Pte al Colegio Immeculada, Panama 1.Rep.de Panama, and a mailing address at c/o Suntrust Invenstment Co and PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIANO J. PIMENTAL, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
