Cases 1 - 10 of 27
FITZMARK, LLC v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
FITZMARK, LLC
Defendant:
ROBERT ROGERS and TRAFFIC TECH INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. THERMEDX LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01957
Plaintiff:
HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
THERMEDX LLC and ROGER CARLTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
REEVES v. GENESYS CLOUD SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2021cv02114
Plaintiff:
ROGER REEVES
Defendant:
GENESYS CLOUD SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
May et al v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2021cv00156
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Plaintiff:
Roger May and Julie May
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A. v. CROWDER TRUCKING, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00112
Defendant:
CROWDER TRUCKING, LLC and ROGER CROWDER
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trahan v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01060
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roger J. Trahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tinnermon et al v. REV Recreation Group, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00336
Plaintiff:
Roger McKay and Donna Tinnermon
Defendant:
REV Recreation Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEMPER INDEPENDENCE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SCHICKEL et al
as 3:2017cv00138
Defendant:
INDIANA FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY, JULIAN INMAN, BROCK ROGERS and others
Plaintiff:
KEMPER INDEPENDENCE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. SWIERBUT et al
as 1:2017cv02869
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Defendant:
SWERBS FINANCIAL, INC., SWERBS MOTORS, INC. and ROGER A SWIERBUT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Russell v. DRH Cambridge Homes, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00047
Plaintiff:
Roger Russell
Defendant:
DRH Cambridge Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
