Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Simmons v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Simmons
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Fesko v. Equiant Financial Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04371
Defendant:
Heather Harris, Wade Burns and Equiant Financial Services Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Mammie Fesko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fesko v. Equiant Financial Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01366
Defendant:
Heather Harris, Wade Burns and Equiant Financial Services Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Mammie Fesko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nelson v. Newmark Knight Frank et al
as 2:2017cv03150
Plaintiff:
Wade Nelson
Defendant:
Newmark Knight Frank, BGC Partners Incorporated and G&E Real Estate Management Services Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dalton v. Atchison et al
as 3:2016cv08014
Plaintiff:
Harry D Dalton
Defendant:
Wade Atchison , Unknown Party and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LOL Finance Company v. Carrigan, et al.
as 2:2010cv00340
Plaintiff:
LOL Finance Company
Defendant:
Wade P Carrigan, Beth Carrigan and Wade Cattle Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wendelschafer et al v. Westfield Insurance Company et al
as 2:2009cv02157
Plaintiff:
Wade Wendelschafer and Caroline Wendelschafer
Defendant:
Westfield Insurance Company, John Does I-V, Jane Does I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Wade v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.
as 2:2009cv02084
Plaintiff:
Richard Wade
Defendant:
Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Ferrellgas, L.P. v Wilson, et al.
as 2:2008cv00929
Plaintiff:
Ferrellgas, L.P., Ferrellgas, L.P. and Ferrellgas, L.P.
Defendant:
Michael Wilson, Jane Doe Wilson, Wade Wakefield and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
