Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Reebok International Limited v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv01100
Plaintiff:
REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (a limited company of the United Kingdom) and Reebok International Limited
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv01084
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv01019
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv00936
Counter Defendant:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv00892
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv00884
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Andrews v. New Market Realty LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00381
Plaintiff:
Philip Andrews
Defendant:
New Market Realty LLC and Daniel Nieding
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2021cv00177
Counter Defendant:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Hyatt v. Iancu
as 1:2020cv00983
Defendant:
Andrei Iancu and Andrew Hirshfeld
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00575
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
