Cases 11 - 20 of 86
In re: Rembrandt Technologies LP Patent Litigation
as 1:2007md01848
In Re:
Rembrandt Technologies LP Patent Litigation
Defendant:
Adelphia Communications Corporation; Century-TCI California, LP; Century-TCI California Communications, LP; Century-TCI Distribution Company, LLC; Century-TCI Holdings, LLC; Parnassos, LP; Parnassos C, Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Enterprises, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Rembrandt Technologies, LLC d/b/a Remstream
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk Jeffery N. Luthi, Rembrandt Technologies LP, Cablevision Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Convolve, Inc. v. Dell Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00244
Defendant:
Western Digital Corporation, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc., Dell Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Convolve, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Robert W Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
LML Patent Corporation v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 2:2008cv00448
Not Classified By Court:
Robert W Faulkner
Plaintiff:
LML Patent Corporation
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Company, Wachovia Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 6:2009cv00203
Plaintiff:
Fractus, S.A.
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Research Institute, LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc., Personal Communications Devices Holdings, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
V Bryan Medlock, Jr, Robert W Faulkner and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00269
Defendant:
Google Inc., Match.Com LLC, Softlayer Technologies, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Red Hat, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC
Undetermined:
Hesha Abrams, Robert W Faulkner and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Vesper Technology Research, LLC v. AMX, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01257
Plaintiff:
Vesper Technology Research, LLC
Defendant:
AMX, LLC and Harman International Industries, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Sharp Electronics Corp., Panasonic Corporation of North America, RGB Systems, Inc. d/b/a Extron Electronics and others
Not Classified By Court:
Robert W Faulkner and Judge David Folsom
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
TQP Development LLC vs v. 1-800-Flowers.com Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00248
Defendant:
Verizon Data Services LLC, 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc., Micro Electronics, Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Orbitz, LLC, CHS, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
TQP Development, LLC
Consolidated 3Rd Party Defendant:
Radware, Inc.
Consolidated 3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Branch Bank and Trust Company
Not Classified By Court:
Robert W Faulkner and David Keyzer
Not Yet Classified:
TQP Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
DownUnder Wireless, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00206
Defendant:
Motorola Mobility Inc, LG Electronics, Motorola, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Robert W Faulkner
Plaintiff:
DownUnder Wireless, LLC
Counter Claimant:
HTC Corporation, Pantech Wireless, Inc., Personal Communications Devices, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
MAZ Encryption Technologies LLC v. CDW Corporation
as 1:2016cv00255
Plaintiff:
MAZ Encryption Technologies LLC
Defendant:
CDW Corporation
Counter_claimant:
CDW Corporation
Counter_defendant:
MAZ Encryption Technologies LLC
Mediator:
Robert Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Juxtacomm-Texas Software, LLC v. Axway, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv00011
Defendant:
Axway, Inc., Lawson Software, Inc., Office Depot, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Magic Software Enterprises, Ltd., Magic Software Enterprises, Inc., Lawson Software Americas, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Michael McLemore and Robert W Faulkner
Counter Defendant:
JuxtaComm-Texas Software, LLC and JuxtaComm Technologies, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Shopplex.com Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
