Cases 11 - 20 of 27
eDekka LLC v. Foot Locker, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00432
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Inc. and Footlocker.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Denimafia Inc. v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc
as 14-1156
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Denimafia Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Foot Locker, Inc., The Sports Authority, Inc., Famous Horse, Inc., DBA V.I.M. and others
Antennatech LLC v. Foot Locker Inc.
as 1:2014cv00499
Plaintiff:
Antennatech LLC
Defendant:
Foot Locker Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
The Fashion Exchange LLC v. Hybrid Promotions, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01254
Plaintiff:
The Fashion Exchange LLC
Defendant:
Hybrid Promotions, LLC, Jarrod Dogan, Gavin Dogan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Foot Locker, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
Qommerce Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Inc. and Footlocker.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Poneman v. Nike Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08809
Plaintiff:
Daniel Poneman
Defendant:
Nike Inc. and Foot Locker Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Arunachalam v. Foot Locker, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00607
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Data Carriers LLC v. Foot Locker Inc.
as 1:2013cv00786
Plaintiff:
Data Carriers LLC
Defendant:
Foot Locker Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Reinsdorf v. Brown Shoe Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02904
Defendant:
Macy's Inc., Foot Locker, Inc., Brown Shoe Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Reinsdorf
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Gravity Defyer Corporation v. Under Armour Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01842
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc, BackCountry.Com, Inc., Champs Sports Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gravity Defyer Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
