Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Powell v. Proctor & Gamble Company, The
as 2:2010cv00487
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Powell
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble Company, The
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0292 False Marking - Marking with Patent Number that is expired
Calton v. The Proctor & Gamble Company et al
as 2:2010cv00406
Plaintiff:
Marcus Calton, Marcus Calton, Marcus Calton and others
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company, KAZ, Incorporated and KAZ USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0292 False Marking - Marking with Patent Number that is expired
Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. v. The Proctor & Gamble Company
as 0:2009cv00999
Plaintiff:
Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. and Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc.
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Playtex Products, Inc. v. Proctor & Gamble Company
as 1:2008cv03417
Plaintiff:
Playtex Products, Inc., Playtex Products, Inc. and Playtex Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY v. ASHER, D.D.S., M.S.
as 2:2007cv04215
Plaintiff:
THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY
Defendant:
RANDALL S. ASHER, D.D.S., M.S.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
HEMPHILL v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv01236
Plaintiff:
ALLEGRA D. HEMPHILL
Defendant:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION and PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Asher v. Glaxosmithkline et al
as 1:2007cv00339
Plaintiff:
Randall S. Asher and Randall S. Asher
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline, Proctor & Gamble Company, The, Proctor & Gamble Company, The and others
Counter Claimant:
Proctor & Gamble Company, The, Proctor & Gamble Company, The, Proctor & Gamble Company, The and others
Counter Defendant:
Randall S. Asher and Randall S. Asher
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0001 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
