Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,296
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
John Antony v. Disney Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 24-5140
Plaintiff: JOHN P. ANTONY
Defendant: DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC. and BUENA VISTA BOOKS, INC., successor to Disney Book Group, LLC
Mango v. Best Version Media, LLC.
as 3:2024cv00854
Plaintiff: Gregory P. Mango
Defendant: Best Version Media, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Guang Tai He Import Export, Inc. v. Daniel P. Mitchell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00930
Plaintiff: Guang Tai He Import Export, Inc.
Defendant: Daniel P. Mitchell and Does 1-5, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Genesis Coin, Inc. v. AML Software, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv20392
Plaintiff: Genesis Coin, Inc.
Defendant: AML Software, Inc., S and P Solutions, LLC, Silverlogic LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Gemmell v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00579
Plaintiff: Mark Gemmell
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, hengyangshixiaoguiwangluokejiyouxiangongsi, LoveTaoTao and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Halliburton Energy Services Inc et al v. Weatherford U S L P
as 6:2024cv00090
Plaintiff: Halliburton Energy Services Inc, Halliburton Technology Partners LLC and Halliburton Technology Partners L L C
Defendant: Weatherford U S L P
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?