Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Eric Watkins v. Reed Elsevier Inc et al
as 2:2014cv04219
Defendant:
Does and Reed Elsevier Inc
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins
Eric Watkins v. Pearson PLC et al
as 2:2014cv04240
Defendant:
Does, Pearson PLC, Proquest LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins
Eric Watkins v. The Associated Press et al
as 2:2014cv04230
Defendant:
Does, Dow Jones & Company Inc, Reed Elsevier Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins
Eric Watkins v. Proquest LLC et al
as 2:2014cv04236
Defendant:
Does and Proquest LLC
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins
Eric Watkins v. The McClatchy Company et al
as 2:2014cv04212
Defendant:
Does, Proquest LLC, Reed Elsevier, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins
Eric Watkins v. Dow Jones & Company Inc et al
as 2:2014cv04211
Defendant:
Does, Dow Jones & Company Inc, Proquest LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins
National Association of Forensic Counselors, Inc. et al v. Narconon International et al
as 6:2014cv00187
Plaintiff:
National Association of Forensic Counselors, Inc. and American Academy of Certified Forensic Counselors, Inc.
Defendant:
Narconon International, Narconon of Oklahoma, Inc. , Narconon of Georgia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
WATKINS v. ITM RECORDS et al
as 2:2014cv01049
Plaintiff:
JAMES WATKINS
Defendant:
ITM RECORDS, AMAZON.COM, INC., RELATIVITY MEDIA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
WATKINS v. ITM RECORDS et al
as 2:2013cv01961
Plaintiff:
JAMES WATKINS
Defendant:
ITM RECORDS, CADNOR, LTD., SPUN.COM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Michael Watkins, et al v. Kajima International, Inc., et al
as 12-6315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. WATKINS and MICHAEL D. WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
KAJIMA INTERNATIONAL, INC., HIROAKI HOSHINO, CEO of U. S. Operations for Kajima Corporation, RONALD M. GEORGE, individually and in his offiicial capacity as Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, City of Sacramento, California and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
