Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Damnjanovic et al v. United States Department of the Air Force et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv11920
Plaintiff: Budimir Damnjanovic and Desanka Damnjanovic
Defendant: United States Department of the Air Force, Deborah Lee James, United States Department of Defense and others
MacKay v. Crews
as 14-1566
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
Bruce Horton v. USA
as 14-15537
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRUCE HORTON
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MacKay v. Crews
as 14-836
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
Horton-v-United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv04912
Plaintiff: Bruce Horton
Defendant: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
MacKay v. Crews
as 13-4140
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
Natl Assoc. of Manufacturers, et al v. SEC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-5252
Petitioner - Appellant: National Association of Manufacturers, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Business Roundtable
Respondent - Appellee: Securities and Exchange Commission
Intervenor - Appellee: Amnesty International USA and Amnesty International Limited
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2013cv01063
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CUSTOMS AND BORDER PATROL , JANET A. NAPOLITANO and others
Plaintiff: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Movant: MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Grove US LLC v. Sany America Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00677
Plaintiff: Grove US LLC
Defendant: Sany America Inc and Sany Heavy Industry Co Ltd
Interested Party: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS et al v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00635
Petitioner: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS , CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE
Respondent: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Intervenor: AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA and AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Amicu: EXPERTS ON THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO , FRED ROBARTS , GREGORY MTHEMBU-SALTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?