Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Poneman v. Nike Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08809
Plaintiff:
Daniel Poneman
Defendant:
Nike Inc. and Foot Locker Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Arunachalam v. Foot Locker, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00607
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Data Carriers LLC v. Foot Locker Inc.
as 1:2013cv00786
Plaintiff:
Data Carriers LLC
Defendant:
Foot Locker Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Reinsdorf v. Brown Shoe Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02904
Defendant:
Macy's Inc., Foot Locker, Inc., Brown Shoe Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Reinsdorf
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Gravity Defyer Corporation v. Under Armour Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01842
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc, BackCountry.Com, Inc., Champs Sports Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gravity Defyer Corporation
EMG Technology, LLC v. Foot Locker, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
EMG Technology, LLC
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Inc. , Footlocker.com, Inc. , Eastbay, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Pragmatus Telecom LLC v. Foot Locker Inc.
as 1:2012cv01682
Plaintiff:
Pragmatus Telecom LLC
Defendant:
Foot Locker Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Clear With Computers, LLC v. Foot Locker, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00676
Plaintiff:
Clear With Computers, LLC
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Inc. and Footlocker.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Geotag, Inc. v. Foot Solutions Inc.
as 2:2012cv00485
Plaintiff:
Geotag, Inc.
Defendant:
Foot Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Holfinger, et al v. Clearly Beautiful Nails Mobile Laser, LLC, et al
as 1:2012cv01967
Plaintiff:
James R. Holfinger and Southwest Foot and Ankle Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Clearly Beautiful Nails Mobile Laser, LLC, Michael Berman and David Zuckerman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
