Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mauldin Brand, Inc. v Moss
as 1:2024cv01227
Defendant:
Shad Gregory Moss and Bow Wow
Plaintiff:
Mauldin Brand, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Mauldin Brand Inc. v. Black Promoters Collective LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04284
Defendant:
Shad Gregory Moss, Black Promoters Collective LLC, G Squared Events Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mauldin Brand Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Toho Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv03723
Plaintiff:
Toho Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 2019trendy shops, abbc6556565fds65 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Cooper v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv02077
Plaintiff:
Alice Cooper
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 11JYH917J, 2011 fashion clothes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv02534
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", anjinhua, anqiujingshuai and others
Plaintiff:
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Camp Bow Wow Franchising, Inc. v. Shear Pawfection, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00993
Defendant:
Shear Pawfection, LLC, Centerville Shopping Center, LLC and 4032 Linden Avenue, LLC
Plaintiff:
Camp Bow Wow Franchising, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
D.O.G. DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al v. NELMS et al
as 3:2011cv05365
Plaintiff:
D.O.G. DEVELOPMENT, LLC and CAMP BOW WOW DISTRIBUTION, LLC
Defendant:
KATHIE NELMS and PATRICIA M. KEEFE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
