Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Natl Bus Forms & Printing, Inc v. Gregory Phillip
as 12-20280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIONAL BUSINESS FORMS & PRINTING, INC., doing business as Graphxonline.com, doing business as Quickstickers.com
Defendant - Appellee:
FORD MOTOR CO
Parallel Networks, LLC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. et al
as 6:2010cv00111
Defendant:
Kayak Software Corporation, Orbitz Worldwide Inc, Yahoo! Inc and others
Consolidated Defendant:
JAG Footwear, Accessories and Retail Corporation, Onestop Internet, Inc., HSN LP and others
Plaintiff:
Parallel Networks, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
Richard Grainger, Michael McLemore and Robert W Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
National Business Forms v. Gregory Phillips, et al
as 10-20023
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
NATIONAL BUSINESS FORMS & PRINTING, INC., doing business as Graphxonline.com, doing business as Quickstickers.com
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
FORD MOTOR CO
ST Sales Tech Holdings LLC v. Daimler Chrysler Co LLC et al
as 6:2007cv00346
Plaintiff:
ST Sales Tech Holdings LLC, ST Sales Tech Holdings LLC, ST Sales Tech Holdings LLC and others
Defendant:
Daimler Chrysler Co LLC, Daimler Chrysler Corporation, Chrysler Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. Ford Motor Co
as 2:2007cv02327
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Credit Company, Ford Motor Credit Company, Ford Motor Credit Company and others
Movant:
Target Corporation, Target Corporation, Target Bank and others
Counter Claimant:
Ford Motor Credit Company, Ford Motor Co, Ford Motor Credit Company and others
Counter Defendant:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P
Special Master:
Bernard H Chao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
