Intellectual Property Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Selecta Klemm GMBH Co. KG et al v. Westhoff Vertriebsgesellschaft, mbH et al
as 2:2023cv00531
Plaintiff: Selecta Klemm GMBH Co. KG and Klemm & Sohn GmbH & Co. KG
Defendant: Westhoff Vertriebsgesellschaft, mbH, Vivero Internacional, S.A. de C.V., Plant Source International Mexico and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Armaturenfabrik Franz Schneider GmbH + Co. KG v. RJ Machine Company, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00680
Plaintiff: Armaturenfabrik Franz Schneider GmbH + Co. KG
Defendant: RJ Machine Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
as 2:2023cv00322
Plaintiff: Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG
Defendant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
W.H. Wall Family Holdings, LLLP v. Biotronik SE & Co. KG
as 6:2021cv00019
Defendant: Biotronik SE & Co. KG
Plaintiff: W.H. Wall Family Holdings, LLLP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
IPCom Gmbh & Co. KG v. Sprint Spectrum L.P. et al
as 2:2020cv00321
Defendant: Sprint Communications, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Sprint Communications Co., L.P. and others
Plaintiff: IPCom Gmbh & Co. KG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
IPCom Gmbh & Co. KG v. Verizon Communications Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00323
Defendant: Verizon Services Corp, Verizon Business Network Services Inc, Verizon Enterprise Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff: IPCom Gmbh & Co. KG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
IPCom Gmbh & Co. KG v. AT&T Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00322
Counter Defendant: IPCom Gmbh & Co. KG
Counter Claimant: AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Communications, LLC, Verizon Communications Inc and others
Defendant: AT&T Inc, AT&T Services Inc, AT&T Mobility II LLC and others
Consolidated Defendant: Verizon Enterprise Solutions, LLC, Verizon Online LLC, Verizon Services Corp and others
Intervenor: Nokia of America Corporation and Ericsson Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Donald E Tiller, Karl Bayer and David Folsom
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Biomedcraft Designs, Inc. v. Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00679
Defendant: Karl Storz SE & Co. KG and Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Biomedcraft Designs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
U.S. Silica Company v. Amberger-Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG
as 2:2020cv00297
Plaintiff: U.S. Silica Company
Defendant: Amberger-Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
U.S. Silica Company v. Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00298
Plaintiff: U.S. Silica Company
Defendant: Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?