Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Rider Clothing LLC v. BoardRiders, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04098
Defendant:
Boardriders, Inc., Quiksilver Inc, brookfield asset and others
Petitioner:
Taylor Grant Durbin
Plaintiff:
Rider Clothing LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Fox et al v. DC Shoes, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00097
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Fox and Dirtball Fashion, LLC
Defendant:
DC Shoes, Inc. and Quiksilver, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
QS Wholesale, Inc., et al v. World Marketing, Inc.
as 14-55207
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
QS WHOLESALE, INC., a California Corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
WORLD MARKETING, INC,, a New Jersey Corporation
Counter-defendant - Appellant:
QUIKSILVER, INC.
QS Wholesale Inc et al v. Rox Volleyball Inc et al
as 8:2013cv00512
Defendant:
1st Place Team Sales Inc and Rox Volleyball Inc
Plaintiff:
QS Wholesale Inc and Quiksilver Inc
Quiksilver, Inc. v. Various John Does, Jane Does and XYZ Companies
as 1:2011cv04137
Plaintiff:
Quiksilver, Inc.
Defendant:
Various John Does, Jane Does and XYZ Companies
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Quiksilver Inc v. Robert Conley et al
as 8:2011cv00751
Defendant:
Robert Conley and Does
Plaintiff:
Quiksilver Inc
Levi Strauss & Co. v. Quiksilver, Inc.
as 5:2011cv01177
Plaintiff:
Levi Strauss & Co.
Defendant:
Quiksilver, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Levi Strauss & Co. v. Quiksilver, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01177
Plaintiff:
Levi Strauss & Co.
Defendant:
Quiksilver, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Hardy Way LLC et al v. Ultimate Sports Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01949
Defendant:
Does, David Sedaghati and Ultimate Sports Inc
Plaintiff:
Hardy Way LLC and Quiksilver Inc
Sanrio, Inc. et al v. A La Orden T-Shirts et al
as 3:2010cv02212
Plaintiff:
Sanrio, Inc. , Disney Enterprises, Inc. , Nike, Inc. and others
Defendant:
A La Orden T-Shirts, Francisco J. Rodriguez-Garcia, Angie's Fashion and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
