Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC v. SPX Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00529
Defendant:
SPX Flow US, LLC, Does I through X, SPX Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Summit Tool Company v. SPX Corporation
as 5:2012cv01290
Plaintiff:
Summit Tool Company
Defendant:
SPX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
SPX Corporation v. ATEQ Corporation
as 8:2011cv01324
Defendant:
ATEQ Corporation
Plaintiff:
SPX Corporation
Sudmo Holding GmbH v. SPX Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00561
Plaintiff:
Sudmo Holding GmbH
Defendant:
SPX Corporation and SPX Flow Technology Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tex Pat, LLC v. SPX Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv00200
Plaintiff:
Tex Pat, LLC
Defendant:
SPX Corporation and SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SPX Corporation v. Mastercool, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01266
Plaintiff:
SPX Corporation
Defendant:
Mastercool, U.S.A., Inc., Norco Industries, Inc. and RTI Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SPX Corporation v. Thermal Processing Solutions et al
as 2:2009cv07324
Plaintiff:
SPX Corporation
Defendant:
Thermal Processing Solutions and Aledanzro Rey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
SPX Corporation v. Genesis Lamp Corporation et al.
as 1:2009cv02263
Defendant:
Edward C. Zukowski and Genesis Lamp Corporation
Plaintiff:
SPX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Emanuel v. SPX Corporation
as 6:2009cv00220
Plaintiff:
Cedric R Emanuel
Defendant:
SPX Corporation and OTC Tools Division
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
St. Denis Innovations LLC v. SPX Corporation
as 5:2007cv00784
Counter Defendant:
St. Denis Innovations LLC
Defendant:
SPX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
