Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Churchill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv03024
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Churchill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Churchill v. Commissioner of SSA
as 4:2020cv04204
Plaintiff:
Linda Churchill
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Trapnell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv00083
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Churchill Trapnell
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Churchill v. Saul
as 3:2019cv00204
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Lester D. Churchill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Churchill v. Commissioner of SSA
as 4:2018cv04032
Plaintiff:
Linda Churchill
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Churchill v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Dale Churchill
Notice Only:
US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Churchill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv01186
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jodi Churchill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Jeffrey Churchill v. Carolyn Colvin
as 13-35578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY FARRELL CHURCHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security
Churchill v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv00564
Plaintiff:
Alfred J. Churchill
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Churchill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv01101
Plaintiff:
Jodie Churchill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
