Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Upham v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Upham
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Randy Allen Watson v. Kilolo Kijakazi et al
as 5:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Watson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Ashlock v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01687
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Ashlock
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Upham v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv01784
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Upham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Randy Allen Watson v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2020cv02052
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Baumann v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv00204
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Baumann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Upham v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2018cv02129
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Upham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Houghton v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv01449
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Houghton
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Shrack v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv02064
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Shrack
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Snyder v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv00691
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Snyder
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
