Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jerritt Lee
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stephens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Stephens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hoilman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hoilman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Stephen Dewayne Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BOWLIN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BOWLIN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
EARLEY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN B. EARLEY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Snider v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00018
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Stephen Snider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Stephens v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00320
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Ian Paul Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Saul
as 7:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Stephen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
La Roche v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00352
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Stephen La Roche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
