Cases 111 - 120 of 199
Valenzuela #172770 v. Moody et al
as 2:2017cv02089
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Chris Moody, Regina Dorsey, Crystal Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valenzuela #172770 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01892
Petitioner:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Valenzuela #172770 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01893
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Jessica Raak, Corizon Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melinda Valenzuela v. Melissa Beal, et al
as 17-16199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELINDA GABRIELLA VALENZUELA
Defendant - Appellee:
MELISSA BEAL and TAMMY TAYLOR
Valenzuela #172770 v. Moody et al
as 2:2017cv01582
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Chris Moody, Regina Dorsey, Joel Breuault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melinda Valenzuela v. K. Ramo
as 17-15943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELINDA GABRIELLA VALENZUELA
Defendant - Appellee:
K. RAMOS
Valenzuela #172770 v. Thomas et al
as 2:2017cv00635
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Kataushia Thomas, Julia Barnett and E Baskas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valenzuela #172770 v. Baskas et al
as 2:2017cv00639
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
E Baskas, Oyuki Coronado, Katrina Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valenzuela #172770 v. Corizon Health et al
as 2:2016cv04120
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Julia Barnett, Tammy L Taylor and Kataushia Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bivins v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv02016
Defendant:
Ron Credio, Stacey Crabtree, Arizona, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Evan Bivins
Petitioner:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
